JQ in Blogland
On the AvonRomance blog, January 5, 2011, JQ is a contestant on the first (and quite possibly the last) episode of Romance Author Jeopardy!
JQ's book video promo for Ten Things I Love About You is featured on the Waxcreative blog, April 16, 2010: The Best Book Video Promo of the Year.
JQ's book video promo for What Happens in London is featured on the Waxcreative blog, May 7, 2009: The Best Book Video Promo... Ever.
Read about how an Autographed by the Author sticker saved JQ's dress on the Waxcreative blog, August 8, 2008: Quinn wins! Extra kudos for the sticker…
Interviews with JQ
Find out what JQ would sing on The Gong Show in this interview for USA Today's Happily Ever After blog.
Originally appearing on "Risky Regencies," October 27, 2008, an interview by Diane Gaston.
Originally appearing on "Dishing with the Divas," June 12, 2006, an interview by Candice Hern.
Articles by JQ
The Secret Diaries Confessions of Julia Quinn
Originally appeared at Romantic Inks on December 2, 2006.
Originally appeared at Fog City Divas on June 13, 2006
Ten Occasionally Bizarre, Totally Random Facts about Julia Quinn
Originally seen on Squawk Radio in July 2005
Julia Quinn brings you: Tales From the Front Line
Originally seen on Squawk Radio in July 2005
Julia Quinn on the Perils, Pitfalls, and Pleasures of Writing a Series
Originally seen on Squawk Radio in July 2005
Julia Quinn on Writing First Person
an interview With Julia Quinn by Diane Gaston
Originally appearing on “Risky Regencies,” October 27, 2008
Diane: Tell us about Mr. Cavendish, I Presume? How it is connected to The Lost Duke of Wyndham?
JQ: Some time ago I was humming an old Dire Straits song called "Industrial Disease," and I got to the line: "Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong." Being the historical romance writer I am, I immediately change that to: "Two men say they're the Duke of Something. One of them must be wrong." The trick there, though, was to figure out how on earth the succession to a Dukedom could be in doubt, because that sort of thing was generally well-documented.
Once I came up with a way to make the plot work, I started thinking about the characters. Which would be the bad guy—the current duke or the long-lost duke? Then I thought—wouldn't it be so much more interesting if they were both good guys?
At that point I realized I'd need two books, since if both were hero material, both would need to their own love stories. At first I thought I would write them sequentially, with one picking up where the other ended, but as I delved into the plotting, I realized that there were so many scenes that were crucial to both sets of characters. I couldn't bear, for example, to show the big reveal scene (when the characters learn who is the real duke) from only one hero's point of view. So I ended up with two novels that took place at the same time.
Diane: We're all about taking risks here at Risky Regencies. What do you think is the greatest creative risk you've taken in this book?
JQ: Running the stories simultaneously. This meant I was going to have to write them simultaneously as well. It was a tremendous creative challenge for me—and one that I found very exciting and energizing. I loved weaving two separate and distinct love stories through one set of external events. But at the same time, I risked alienating some readers, who might not like this approach. If you've read Lost Duke, for example, you know who the real duke is before you start Cavendish. I personally don’t think this detracts from the novel in any way; the real heart of the story is in the characters and how they adjust to and learn from the events. But some readers didn’t like this; they felt they’d started the story already “spoiled.”
Diane: With Mr. Cavendish and The Lost Duke so intertwined, did you have to do anything different than your usual plotting process?
JQ: Absolutely! In fact, this was the hardest part of the process. I wrote a joint outline for the two books, which was far more daunting than I’d envisioned. Normally when I’m plotting I can make my secondary characters do whatever is best for the main story, but this time I had to consider the other book as well. It took forever. I’m not kidding when I say I went through seventeen versions. (Okay, many of the versions were somewhat truncated, but still.) And I kept switching who would end up with whom!
Diane: What is it about the Regency that keeps you writing in that time period?
JQ: I’m not sure exactly. It just seems to work for me. The witty repartee, probably.
Diane: You've won the RITA two years in a row, 2008 for The Secret Diaries of Miss Miranda Cheever, and 2007 for On the Way to the Wedding. Can you tell us what this has meant to you?
JQ: It’s indescribable. There is something so special about validation and praise from one’s peers. And I had reached the finals so many times that when I finally won, I couldn’t stop laughing. I was giddy, absolutely giddy.
Diane: I've heard your excellent workshop on writing dialogue. What is your greatest weakness in writing dialogue, the one thing you find yourself having to fix before turning in that final draft? (Mine is overuse of dialogue tags)
JQ: I find myself deleting dialogue tags, too. But weirdly, I also find that I have to add action tags and emotional tags to flesh things out.
Diane: What is next for you?
JQ: I’m writing a spin-off of The Secret Diaries of Miss Miranda Cheever. It’s about Lady Olivia Bevelstoke. I’ve paired her up with an all-new character named Harry Valentine. Olivia is such a great character. I think it’ll be a lot of fun!

The Secret Diaries Confessions of Julia Quinn
Originally appeared at Romantic Inks on December 2, 2006.
In no particular order...
I will do almost anything to avoid writing, even if I actually do enjoy it once I get started. At my Starbucks, where I’m supposed to be able to work diligently because I have no internet access (at least no free access, and I’m too cheap to pay for it), I end up chatting with the other regulars—-Larry the graphics guy, Jennifer who just divorced her best friend, Howard (I don’t know what he does), the older dude whose name I forget, but I know all about his politics (far left) and the fact that he has no internet access at home because it’s cheaper to have TMobile and logon at Starbucks. There’s also SAT-prep woman, who leads all her classes over lattes (my vocabulary is faboo after so many years of eavesdropping) and SAT-prep man, who I think might be married to SAT-prep woman, although I’m not certain. And the other test-prep guy, who appears to be independent of the other two (who clearly work together), but who is infinitely more mellow, plus the college senior who also works at J. Crew (and alerts me of sales.) Oh! And don’t forget the two sisters who own a cookie-decorating business. Can you tell I’m a people watcher? I’m just crushed that cute soccer guy has moved on...
Speaking of writing, there are certain words I egregiously overuse. I’m not going to say what they are, because none of you will ever be able to read one of my books the same way again.
I have a weakness for boss/secretary romances, usually found in the Harlequin Presents line.
I also have a weakness for Haagen-Dazs Dulce de Leche ice cream. And strawberry. And... well, pretty much any flavor as long as it doesn’t contain bananas. By the way, Haagen-Dazs light ice cream is amazing. It’s still bad for you, but it’s not as bad for you, so you don’t have to feel quite as guilty. The S’mores flavor is particularly good.
I hate bananas.
No, I mean I really hate bananas. The smell gives me the heebee-jeebees.
I love the phrase heebee-jeebees but rarely find the opportunity to use it.
I’m also not fond of olives, which was somewhat problematic when I was working as a travel writer in Greece. Not that I spoke a word of Greek when I got the job. I got by with a lot of smiling, hand gestures and following words and phrases: Oil, vinegar, and “boyfriend in America.”
I really did have a boyfriend in America, and I married him.
Said husband figures into every single one of my book dedications.
Said husband HAS NOT READ MOST OF MY BOOKS.
Said husband, when confronted with this while he was reading the manuscript of his father’s novel, said, “But you don’t need my help.”
Said husband sometimes says exactly the right thing to get him out of trouble.
Said husband approves of the title of my next book: The Secret Diaries of Miss Miranda Cheever (not that he’ll ever read it.)
That’s okay. I haven’t had to clean out the cat box in seven years.
I hate cleaning the cat box, but oddly enough, not as much as I hate bananas...
;-) JQ

An interview With Julia Quinn by Candice Hern
Originally appearing on “Dishing with the Divas,” June 12, 2006
Candice: Tell us a little about your upcoming book, On the Way to the Wedding.
JQ: Think Comedy of Errors. Gregory is in love with Hermione, who is in love with her father's secretary. Lucy thinks he's a better match, so she offers to help him win Hermione's heart, but then she falls in love with Gregory herself. Which is a bit sticky, as she's engaged to Lord Haselby. And then enter Lucy's brother Richard... Well, you get the picture.
Candice: How did it feel when you had written THE END on your last Bridgerton manuscript? Was it sad to be finished with them? Or liberating?
JQ: Both. Mostly, I heaved a huge sigh of relief, but then again, I do this at the end of every book. It's nice, though, to work with a clean slate. But as I've been developing my current project, it's been a little strange—I can't remember the last time I had to come up with so many new characters.
Candice: You now have available for download Second Epilogs for 2 of your Bridgerton books, and it sounds like you'll be doing one for all 8 books. Did this idea come about as a way of not quite letting go of the Bridgertons yet?
JQ: No, not really. It was more reader-driven. I get so many queries about the characters and what happened to them after "the end." And I thought, "Well, why not?" What surprised me was how much fun they were to write. I found the process very energizing. I got to work with a different format (short story) and with a very different sort of story arc. Suddenly it wasn't about getting two people together. Instead, I got to show people who were already fully committed. The 2nd Epilogues don't really stand alone, but they're not meant to. They ought to be thought of as companions to the existing novels. Some people have asked why I didn't just put these in with the novels, but I don't think they belong there. They're extras. You don't need them for the story, but they're a lot of fun.
Candice: Now that the 8th and final Bridgerton book is about to released, I'm sure everyone wants to know what's next? Another series? Standalone books? And will you continue to write historicals? Or is there a contemporary romance in your future?
JQ: Right now I'm working on a two-book set, the first of which is called The Two Dukes of Wyndham. I also have an already-written stand alone about a girl in love with her best friend's brother. I'm not sure which will be out first, though.
No plans to write contemporary anytime soon. I think if I did something contemporary, it wouldn't be romance, to tell the truth. And I don't have time right now for anything but romance!
Candice: A few years ago, you appeared as a contestant on THE WEAKEST LINK. Now that you're a seasoned TV performer, is there a reality show you dream of being on some day? American Idol? So You Think You Can Dance? Hell's Kitchen? The Apprentice?
JQ: Oh, gad. No. But I want to get on another game show. I'm a trivia junkie. And it was so much fun.
Candice: A recent poll of AAR readers named The Duke and I as their favorite JQ book. Do you agree? Is it your favorite, too?
JQ: I don't know if it's my favorite, but in many ways it's the most meaningful to me. It's the first of the Bridgertons, which obviously turned out to be a major part of my career, but also, I felt that my writing turned a corner with The Duke and I. I approached the book from a different angle, and I think what emerged was deeper and richer than anything I'd done before. So it will always be special to me for that.
Candice: How do your stories take shape? Do you start from plot or from character? Do you outline or are you a seat-of-the-pants writer? And does your finished product differ much from what you set out to write?
JQ: I'm definitely an outliner. I spend months on the outlines, but that's in large part because I do a lot of work on characterization in the outlining process. As for how I start, that differs from book to book. Sometimes I have a character, sometimes a plot or a premise. For How to Marry a Marquis, I had a title. Or rather, I had Candice's title! (Thank you, Candice. Thank you, thank you, thank you!)
For those of you who don't know this, I owe Candice a HUGE debt. When she was writing traditional regencies, she wanted to name one of her books How to Marry a Duke, but her editor nixed it. I thought her editor was crazy, so I said to Candice, "Can I have it?" (I still remember exactly where we were—having tea (or possibly something more boozy) in Trump Tower, of all places, in Manhattan.) Candice graciously gave me the title, and it eventually changed to How to Marry a Marquis to take advantage of the alliteration.
Candice: Of all the books you've written, which one was the most difficult to write?
JQ: Aren't they all hard? I keep thinking they're supposed to get easier, but they never do.
Candice: If we were to sneak into your house, what book would we find on your bedside table?
JQ: Foreign Babes in Beijing by Rachel DeWoskin. I'm enjoying it tremendously. The author went to Beijing to work for a PR firm and ended up on a Chinese soap opera called (you guessed it) "Foreign Babes in Beijing." I just finished judging two rounds of the Ritas, so I was ready for a break from romance.
Candice: And what note would we find taped to your computer monitor?
JQ: Okay, this is embarrassing, but since you asked, my sister made me tape up a fortune cookie fortune I got that says, "You will earn thousands of dollars daily for doing nothing." She says, "Isn't that the definition of royalties?" I say, "Hey, I DID the work..." But I got the last laugh because —she— got the fortune that said, "Your mother is spreading vicious rumors about you." (My mother denies this, by the way.)

Ten Occasionally Bizarre, Totally Random Facts about Julia Quinn
Originally appeared at Fog City Divas on June 13, 2006
1) When her husband calls, her cellphone rings with The Simpsons theme. When her mother calls, it's Mission: Impossible. Her best friend has Josie and the Pussycats, and her editor gets Tainted Love.
2) Before she was born, the entire maternity ward of her mother's OB-GYN's hospital went on strike. (A sign, perhaps?)
3) When people play the My-Parents-Are-More-Embarrassing-Than-Your-Parents game, she ALWAYS wins. Always.
4) She is DYING to visit Iceland but can't find anyone to go with her.
5) She is a huge Schoolhouse Rock fan and can sing almost every song by heart.
6) She was the only kid in first grade to have a lunchbox with a family member on it. (Think: "Good night, John Boy!")
7) Her husband competed in the Junior Olympics as a sabre fencer.
8) Her recurring dream is getting to some international border and discovering she forgot her passport.
9) She has had the same editor for every single one of her books. (You might not think this is so bizarre, but trust us, it is.)
And finally
10) She has a bad habit of making lists when she can't figure out something more cohesive to say.

Julia Quinn brings you: Tales From the Front Line
Originally seen on Squawk Radio in July 2005
As some of you know, I used to work for Barnes & Noble. Nothing glamorous, mind you. I didn't work in Manhattan at the corporate office or anything. No, I hired on as holiday help in the North Haven, Connecticut store in 1995, and after the manager realized she'd actually hired someone who knew about books, I managed to convince her to let me stay on at only eight hours/week. (Normally, you had to work at least 20.) Eight hours isn't much, but it got me out of the house, earned me some walking around money, and perhaps most importantly, got me a 30% discount on books. (I can't tell you how painful it was to start paying full price for books once I stopped working there.)
But the best part of working in a bookstore was, not surprisingly, the books. It was so wonderful just being around them. I loved knowing what all the new releases were, and there is nothing like the little thrill you get when you stumble across the coolest book that you know you never would have discovered had you not been shelving it.
Former booksellers also have a pathological need to tidy up bookstore shelves:
"Good GRAVY! What is the Bevarly doing in the middle of the Brockways!!! And don't they know that Outlander should be shelved before Dragonfly in Amber??? I don't care if it's in aphabetical order that way—it's just plain wrong!"
But you know, for the most part it was fun. And in honor of booksellers everywhere, I'm going to share the most bizarre, surreal, annoying, nice, really any adjective will do, moments from the three years I was there.
I learn that the café discount has been increased to 50%.
Strangely enough, this occurs during the holiday rush, confirming my suspicions that Mr. Riggio (the head of the company) wants to keep the peons sugared and caffeined.
I discover that I am wasting valuable portions of my brain on really stupid stuff.
A customer comes in with the following question: "I'm looking for a book. It was on this table. Or maybe that one. In July. I don't know the name and I don't know the author, but there was a dog on the cover."
I say, "Yeah, I know what you're talking about."
I am mistaken for someone with a way better bank account:
After chatting for five minutes about books, I tell a customer that I am actually a romance author. She looks at my name tag and shrieks, "Oh my GOD! Are you JULIE GARWOOD????"
I am mistaken for someone with a license to dispense drugs:
The phone rings. I answer it, always a mistake.
"Good morning, Barnes & Noble, North Haven. How may I help you?"
"I'm looking for a book. It's one of those drug guides. The one for nurses."
"Oh, yes, I'm fairly certain we carry that. If you hold I'll go check the shelf."
Goes and checks shelf. Surprises self by finding book.
"Hello? Yes, we have that. Would you like me to put it aside for you?"
"Oh, no. I don't want to buy the book. I was just hoping you would look something up for me. You see, my doctor just prescribed some new medication for me, and I'm not sure if I can take it with the other stuff I'm on. Could you look it up and see?"
"Excuse me. May I put you on hold for a moment?"
GAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHH!
"Hi. I'm back. I'm sorry, but I don't think our insurance covers us for dispensing pharmaclogical advice."
I am mistaken for someone with a non-exploding head:
It's War in the back room. Bernie the periodical guy vs. Chris the stockroom supervisor. It's a duel of the transistor radios. On the receiving desk, Howard Stern. Near the magazine stack, Rush Limbaugh. And over by new releases shelf, there is an innocent romance writer, collapsed into a fetal position as she cradles her head in her hands and tries to drown... out... the noise.
Good morning Squawkland! It's nice to be here!
JQ

Julia Quinn on the Perils, Pitfalls, & Pleasures of Writing a Series
Originally seen on Squawk Radio in July 2005
I never set out to write an eight-book series. Believe me, when I started The Duke and I, I had no idea that I would still be writing about those characters seven years later. In fact, I had every intention of just writing three books. It would be Daphne, Anthony, and Colin (This is why Benedict isn't terribly fleshed out as a character in Duke.) When I pitched this idea to my editor, however, she said to keep it to two books. Trilogies were overdone, she said, and the middle book was always the worst. But I really wanted to do three, so I made my argument, and she agreed. As I was working on The Viscount Who Loved Me (the second book of the series), Duke came out and it sold quite a bit better than expected. Plus, readers really got into the whole Lady Whistledown mystery. So when it came time to write the third book, I asked my editor if she thought I ought to turn it into a quartet. The answer was an enthusiastic YES, and by the time I finished up the fourth book, it was obvious I'd be doing the whole family.
I've enjoyed it a lot, but if I could do it over again, I would have known at the beginning what I was going to do.And I would have made a cheat sheet for myself with all of the characters' pertinent details on it. I have that now, but only after having made some mistakes (including one that no one ever caught!) I would also have plotted the arc of the series a bit more carefully. I had to set Romancing Mr. Bridgerton, for example, eight years after An Offer from a Gentleman because of the way I plotted The Viscount Who Loved Me.
One of the problems about writing series is that you can never please everyone. Readers beg me to bring back old characters (and some take me to task for not doing it!), and then others complain that the family gets too much of a role. Right now I'm hearing from readers who want me to do a huge family reunion in the last book. Which would be sweet, but I just can't do it. The most important thing to remember while writing a series (IMO, at least) is that each book has to be more important than the series as a whole. In other words, you can't write a scene for the point of expanding upon something that happened in an earlier book unless it also supports the current book. And you can't trot characters out just because you like them. Sure, everyone might like an update on a different couple, but writing a whole scene just for them pulls the reader away from the current love story.
But there are also wonderful aspects to writing a series. I may moan when someone asks me about a tiny detail that I can't for the life of me remember (you have no idea the number of times I've had to open my computer files and do a search function to find an answer to a reader query), but on the other hand, it's very gratifying to know that readers are so invested in my characters that they actually care to that degree. I've also had the opportunity to develop secondary characters over multiple books. One of my very favorite things has been writing the character of Violet. As the series progresses, you learn more and more about her. (Me too!)
So would I do it again? Or more to the point, do I plan to do it again? Not anytime soon, I think. I'm ready for a break. My next set of books will be a twofer. I'm looking forward to doing something quite discrete and then moving on. I'm sure we haven't seen the last of the Bridgertons, but I do think it's time for me to set them aside for a bit and recharge my batteries with something else.
After Gregory, of course. I'm putting him in a pretty big pickle. Which he probably deserves.
Best,
JQ

Julia Quinn on Writing First Person
Originally seen on Squawk Radio in July 2005
The big difference between first and third person is, obviously, that with first person, the reader only gets into the head of one person. With third, it can be multiple people, although in romance it's generally only two. (Big exception is Eloisa James, who, IMO, is utterly brilliant with the omniscient narrator and multiple points-of-view.)
But there is an offshoot of this—in first person the reader generally gets deeper into the narrator's head/psyche than in third person. You get to know the character better. You're privy to the thoughts and feelings of that character as described by that character. With the third person, technically speaking you're privy to the thoughts and feelings of a character as described by the narrator (the author.)
These two factors mean that first and third person work better for different types of books. Romance isn't a great fit for first person because romance is, by definition, mainly about TWO characters. If you keep it in first person, you lose half the story (well, not really, but I can't think of a better way to describe it.) This isn't to say that it can't be done, and well (Joan Wolf wrote a few that I thought were great) but if you, as an author, are going to choose to do away with one of the protagonist's point of view, you should probably have a good reason for it.
This is why first person works well for gothic romances. Gothics have a great deal of mystery to them, a woman-in-jeopardy sort of theme. By keeping the reader as in the dark as the character about the hero's thoughts, the author can keep up the sense of drama and fear.
Young Adult fiction works very well in first person as well. There may be (and frequently is) romance in the story, but a lot of the time, the real theme is the growth and life of the main character. And first person allows the author to create that much of a deeper portrait of the character.
Best,
JQ
P.S. In case anyone is interested, second person is written with "You." As in: "You go to the car and open the door. You get in, but you see that your purse has been stolen." The only books I can think of written in second person are Jay McInerney's Bright Lights, Big City and the Choose Your Own Adventure books. Does anyone know any others?
Welcome to JuliaQuinn.com
Site & Copyright Info
JQ'S NEWSLETTER:
Sign up and receive a heads up whenever she has a new book out.
What are you looking for?
Frequently Asked Questions
Upcoming Events
Aug 16, 2013 -
Aug 18, 2013
Romance Writers of Australia Annual Conference
